Opponents are lining up to question the Ohio Sports Betting proposal

Those behind the Senate’s proposal to legalize sports betting Ohio had to know that many prospects wouldn’t love it.

Sponsors of SB 176 finally heard these complaints Wednesday In the Elect the Gambling Committee Listen. There was 17th Certificates submitted with few questions asked. The bill is on a tight schedule with the hope of getting it passed by the end of June.

The two unique parts of the OH sports betting proposal – a lottery game and an open-market approach to licensing – were the toughest.

In particular, there was no casino or Racino operator in the state in the statements. Three owners posted their stance on the electronic bingo portion of the bill. Your coalition has not yet talked about the sports betting part.

Teams and leagues want fair market access for OH sports betting

Three professional sports teams and the PGA tour asked for exactly what Senator Kirk Schuring said no one would get.

The Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Reds, Columbus crew and the tour demanded that legislation require them to obtain licenses. It’s a similar pitch made at committee hearings prior to the introduction of the bill.

All three pro teams also pushed for the state 11 Casinos and Racinos to get automatic licenses too.

“Despite the many positive discussions we have had with lawmakers about fair market access and especially parity between the Ohio teams and the casinos and racinos here, the structure of the current bill does not offer a path for fair market access for professional sports companies in Ohio. “said Ted Tywang, Representing the Browns and crew.

Indeed, the partial bill dramatically favors gaming interests outside of the state, including the requirement that licensees handle the bets themselves and that each license in the Type A group (for mobile and online) would have an unlimited number of usable mobile skins. “

Schuring, who was absent on Wednesday, said he would not give anything to anyone on a “silver platter”.

Lottery dealers want full access to betting

Another group that asked about something that Schuring said they wouldn’t get was lottery retailers.

The Ohio Grocers Association, Bassett’s Market and Bowling Center Associations of Ohio asked about the right to offer standard sports betting in Ohio. Lottery operators can sell with SB 176 $ 20 Tickets for events that winners would pay for from that event’s betting pool.

David Corey, Executive Vice President of the Bowling Group, went one step further. He called the proposed pool use the “most useless and impractical thing we have ever seen”.

“It’s basically a scam”

Corey focused on an example of a BrownsSteelers Game that would have heavy bets on the Browns. That could result in these bettors paying less than theirs $ 20 Bet.

“After the first week, no one will be using it,” Corey said. “They’ll find out it’s basically a scam.”

Schuring emphasized that he did not want the lottery to offer products with a chance of winning.

The college federation has concerns about betting sports betting

One of the head-scratching testimonies came from the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Ohio.

President and General Counsel C. Todd Jones suggested the definition of college betting is too broad. Without specifying what to bet on, club sports also fall under the definition, according to Jones.

He expanded his thoughts on sports betting that offer any type of betting by referring to betting on the betting DraftKings Halloween Candy Bowl last year.

Co-sponsor Sen. Niraj Antani said any sane person would accept that Ohio Casino Control Commission would not approve betting on club sports.

Jones eventually offered an alternative to open college betting: he only allowed betting NCAA basketball and NCAA soccer in the First League.

DraftKings testifies as a proponent of sports betting in Ohio

There were only three testimonials listed as proponents of the OH sports betting part of the bill: Sports trade, the Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course and DraftKings Sports Betting.

DraftKings Senior Manager, Government Affairs Kevin Cochran praised the bill on some points:

  • The “fair” tax rate on the bill at which sports betting revenue is collected 10%.
  • A wide sports betting menu.
  • Mutual licensing that would allow the Ohio CCC to view an applicant’s license in any other jurisdiction as evidence.

Cochran also pitched advertising credits deducted from taxable income to beat the offshore market.

“It sounds kind of crazy, but we have to get the players to break up with their bookmakers,” said Cochran. “And to do that, it offers them an advertisement to get them to try the regulated product, or they don’t have that much incentive to go to the regulated product.”

Comments are closed.